On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 12:32:44AM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > > > On Sep 14, 2026, at 12:07 AM, Theo Buehler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2026 at 10:49:38PM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote: > >> The reproducer did what you said on an IBT amd64 box and I confirm the > >> SIGILL. > > > > Thanks for testing. > > > >> But the same reproducer did not SIGILL for me on my BT aarch64 laptop. > >> Does it need a different reproducer to trigger it on that platform? > > > > Apparently. There's clearly bad code with an obvious fix. Does it matter? > > I’m not totally following your thought process here. What is the diff fixing?
Bad code.
