Does anyone know what Theo was talking about in this post: http://www.sigmasoft.com/~openbsd/archives/html/openbsd-misc/2009-12/msg00596.html
"YP is good stuff. It is going to get us LDAP for nearly free." Could YP be/become a replacement for OpenLDAP? -mark > > Hi, > > I'm getting more and more problems with OpenLDAP 2.3, and would really > like to help "pioneer" the 2.4 porting effort. They're at 2.4.21 at the > moment. A problem that started to crop up, with no error message, is > that additions to the tree don't work the way they used to. > > Problem: I have a master server which feeds some syncrepl slaves, and > when I add something to the tree, my LDAP browser hangs. I then need to > forcibly kill and restart the LDAP server (slapd). Then I can see the > new entry, after reconnecting with my LDAP browser again. So far, it's > irrelevant which LDAP browser I use (I tried luma and gq). > > This makes LDAP more or less read-only for me, and impossible to give > users access to... If someone has an idea apart from upgrading, and/or > a better idea about how to upgrade properly, I'm all ears. > > > TIA! > > > -- > Kind regards, > --Toni++ >
