On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:33:55AM -0500, Todd T. Fries wrote: > As I pointed out to the libvirt maintainer, libvirt should be enabled to use > the qemu engine that does work on OpenBSD. > > Sure it is slower than real hardware, and because of this it makes little > sense > to use for more than testing, but personally I find having a test network of > qemu instances useful to bring up now and then for various testing scenarios. > > If libvirtd could make life easier for this, why would cfengine not be able to > help making sure the virtual network is virtually easy to maintain? > > Point being, if it costs us nothing to enable libvirt support, why would we > disable it?
I'm for libvirt flavor but I think we should cooperate with libvirt maintainer to have some libvirt-minimal without python and other crazy things..., because cfengine then depends on huge list of libs like avahi... jirib
