On 2013/12/11 15:12, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > Landry Breuil <lan...@rhaalovely.net> writes: > > [...] > > > No need to LIB_DEPENDS on cairo/glib2, gtk+3 already does, > > Is "No need to" to be interpreted here as "should not", ie. a general > porting recommendation? > > Upstream explicitely uses this: > `pkg-config --libs gtk+-3.0 glib-2.0 cairo gio-2.0`
imho it would be correct to list the dependency in this case, though in practice it only really makes a difference on !shared arch, and gtk+3 is shared-only. > If for whatever reason our gtk+3 doesn't depend on cairo anymore the > deps will be out of sync. And I see no problem with listing direct deps > explicitely. This question is afaik not specific to gtk+3. I'd kind-of prefer for them to be visibly out of sync ("port doesn't build") as at least then there's a chance the WANTLIB will be regenerated ;)