On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:27:07AM +0800, Tinker wrote:
> Wait, in the interim, the brave user who wants ICU support system-wide now,
> and who has ICU already installed in the system, can just switch the
> "--without-icu" part to "--with-icu" in /usr/ports/devel/boost/Makefile ,
> and do "make; make install" right?

$ make clean=all
$ make
$ make fake
$ make port-lib-depends-check
# fix WANTLIB
$ make update-plist
$ make reinstall

> 
> 
> That will not break binary compatibility with precompiled packages, the only
> thing would be that if some package is specifically incompatible with
> Boost's ICU support, it'd go into undefined behavior, right?
> 
> 
> On 2015-12-17 02:40, Landry Breuil wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:40:47PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> >>On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:32:21PM +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
> >>wrote:
> >>> Tinker <ti...@openmailbox.org> writes:
> >>>
> >>> > On 2015-12-16 05:04, j...@wxcvbn.org wrote:
> >>> >> Tinker <ti...@openmailbox.org> writes:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> What would the decision be based on?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I think that those points should be enough.
> >>> >> - good reasons to use ICU in boost, not just "I need the ICU parts of
> >>> >>   Boost.".  What would be the benefit for the ports tree?
> >>> >
> >>> > I need normalize() to do Unicode normalization!
> >>>
> >>> I'm glad to hear that you want to do Unicode normalization using ICU,
> >>> that is not a valid answer to what I said above.
> >>>
> >>> We have one report here:
> >>>
> >>>   http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=144171504417490&w=2
> >>>
> >>> jirib didn't confirm that ICU was the only thing needed to make his
> >>> aegisub port work, and to my knowledge no existing port requires ICU in
> >>> boost.  The only benefit I can see so far is to have a boost package
> >>> similar to other distros.
> >>
> >>I wonder if adding ICU support to boost would unbreak manik.
> >
> >On that topic i've filed https://github.com/mapnik/mapnik/issues/3202
> >upstream but didnt thought about that boost/icu thing.
> >
> >Either way, touching boost... here be dragons.
> >
> >Landry
> 

-- 
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info

Reply via email to