On 2015/12/15 22:04, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > Tinker <ti...@openmailbox.org> writes: > > > What would the decision be based on? > > I think that those points should be enough. > - good reasons to use ICU in boost, not just "I need the ICU parts of > Boost.". What would be the benefit for the ports tree? > - someone has to do the work, and that includes checking for potential > breakage.
And updating WANTLIB :-) > > Everyone just rolling thumbs or is there any real tradeoff? > > You tell us. ;) Also note that this port does have a maintainer.
