On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
<j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote:
> David Coppa <dco...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
>> <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote:
>>> The switch to explicit FLAVORS is almost complete, there are two
>>> remaining ports, luaposix and lualdoc.
>>> lualdoc is packaged as a library that supports flavors, but afaik it is
>>> a standalone tool.  Debian for example packages it as "lua-ldoc", not
>>> "lua5.1-ldoc".
>>> Here's a diff to switch it to a standalone tool.  Since x11/awesome is
>>> its only consumer, I used MODLUA_VERSION = 5.2 so that people that build
>>> from source don't need to install two lua versions (well, that's
>>> cheap...).
>>> I added a @pkgpath so that people who have lua52ldoc installed can
>>> transparently upgrade, but should I also add bin/lua51 and bin/lua52
>>> symlinks?  I'd prefer not...
>>> Bonus: x11/awesome/patches loses weight.
>>> Thoughts?
>> Reads ok to me, but why have you removed doxygen too?
> Oops, because I temporarily disabled it to do my tests.  Downloading Qt
> over crappy public wifi is painful.  :)
> Fixed diff below.

Just tested it, and it works as intended.

OK dcoppa@


Reply via email to