Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> writes: > j...@wxcvbn.org (Jeremie Courreges-Anglas) writes: > >> Some time ago I took a look at hooking lua53 flavors in the ports that >> support it. It turned out that some ports were already broken with >> particular versions of lua (the most common errors are missing functions >> at dlopen time, and module() errors), yet they were hooked up. >> >> So it's not just about adding lua53 flavors, but about having >> a consistent ports tree. In the end, I think that lua.port.mk should >> stop populating FLAVORS automatically, so that people hacking on lua >> have to explicitely enable the lua versions they tested. Just like for >> python.port.mk. >> >> The diff to explicitely add FLAVORS / hook them up is not ripe yet, >> but first I'd like to know if people object to the proposal above. > > afaik we can stop automatically adding FLAVORS in lua.port.mk; it would > be nice if someone could put this in a bulk to confirm.
Committed, thanks Antoine for the bulk build test. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
