I almost forgot: there is a meta/lxqt with -main and -extras. Just like the one of xfce.
2018-06-27 15:24 GMT-03:00 Elias M. Mariani <[email protected]>: > Just to give a heads-up and ask for reviews on the port of LXQt > desktop environment attached. > > Also in openbsd-wip: > https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/x11/lxqt > > LXQt is a lightweight desktop environment based on Qt5. > I wanted to test it on OpenBSD given that I find KDE and GNOME well > mantained but with to much dependencies... I wanted something lighter > and nicer than XFCE also. > I think that LXQt delivers that. > > I ported all the applications from LXQt, except for: > lxqt-admin, is not very welcoming so I just ignore it: > message(WARNING "OpenBSD is not supported by lxqt-admin-user") > message(WARNING "OpenBSD is not supported by lxqt-admin-time") > Same for qps (qt process manager). > Both apps doesn't seem to fit in the OpenBSD ecosystem anyways... > > I think that the port is usable as it is, but need help with: > - Testing in other systems (only tested on amd64). > - Checking Makefile formatting and methodology, is there something loose ? > - Testing the "applications", I'm just testing mainly the DE, not the > small apps. > - REALLY looking for someone who understands better about the .desktop > files and xdg-dirs. I'm not sure about lots of these files locations > by default. > - Checking the patches that I made to the C++ code, I'm more like a > php programmer. :) > - Someone writing better DESCRs and README? > > I made a mailing-list in googlegroups as the KDE Porting Team did. > So... avoiding spam and going smooth if someone wants to join the effort: > MAINTAINER ?= LXQt porting team <[email protected]> > > It was hard porting this because my lack knowledge about several > points, I hope this gets to the CVS in some moment, but I am really > happy with the result myself. > > LXQt was pretty friendly with the paths and several things, seems that > the thought about *BSD porting and making the project easy to handle > for us. > Only "patch" needed for paths was about searching apps in "/usr/bin" > instead of "/usr/local/bin". > > I guess that's about it. > Waiting for feedback. > Please, avoid desktop environment wars in this thread. :D > > So much work for 31KB ? :( > Cheers. > Elias.
