* Bill Cole: > That's a level which makes me feel pretty sure that something in the > postfix-users pipeline is making an otherwise harmless change to those > messages.
I have not checked every single message, but I just inspected a few of my own posts to this mailing list, and the signatures seem OK. I'm not saying there is no breakage, just that I did not notice it. > Many use "simple" body canonicalization, which makes the signature > fragile. Microsoft products were/are known to screw with email content, but I don't think that any of them are included in this list's software stack? As for body canonicalization, I'll try relaxed instead of simple, but I still object to software messing with my message bodies, even when it comes to whitespaces. -Ralph
