On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:31:24 +0200, Cüneyt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> Hm, it's definitely only the newer beta's. PowerPro has definitely
>> become more sensitive to any sort of activity on my PC, I'm not doing
>> any more intensive tasks on my PC than what I used to.
>
>I can second that. I have no bumpbar but a always-visible bar with 
>vdesk-switch buttons and an active tasks subbar. PP got definitely 
>sluggish than before, noticable each time I switch vdesks, 
>minimize/restore apps or show the organize vdesks window (*vdesk 
>arrange). These actions take usually 2-3 times than before with 
>noticable freezing times. Especially icon & title extraction of the 
>active tasks makes PP totally unresponsive, even though the CPU and disk 
>are *not* used at all.
>
>This behaviour has started after my recent upgrades to 4.5.xx, though it 
>might have begun with earlier versions.
>
>HTH
>
>
>Attention: PowerPro's Web site has moved: http://www.ppro.org 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 
>
>

Hi Cüneyt,

Yep, I agree with you. I think my PowerPro was working fine before the
v4.5.x upgrades. I think I will go back to v4.4.x and see if that
helps. I've just double checked the complete PowerPro changelog
history for PowerPro that someone posted to this group recently, and
there doesn't look to be anything in it that I need v4.5.x for. If
v4.4.x doesn't help (I'm not 100% sure that it was the last working
version), I will jut keep going back versions until I find a version
that works ok on my PC. I think v4.4.02 Beta was the last version that
contained a fix that I needed (the extra pixels for full screen bars),
but I think it was working ok for at least a couple of Beta's after
that.
--

Regards,

CM



Attention: PowerPro's Web site has moved: http://www.ppro.org 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/power-pro/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to