> > As for the dll not looking to be built correct I was basing that on the fact > that all the other shell extension dll's from other products (that are listed > in the registry) have a file type of application extension but also have a > "version" tab but the 64-bit dll I built is missing the version tab. Even the > 32-bit one I built has it. Thus it makes me wonder if it is not getting built > correctly.
Makes sense. I also have seen the "shell extension" on the tooltip in explorer. > > Using dumpbin/exports I can see the following. It is missing dllmain. To be > fair though the original dll does not show dllmain either. You are right. The output looks correct. >> > I am going to try to compile it on my 64-bit machine and see if that helps. I > had been cross-compiling on a 32-bit machine. If that does not help then I > will pursue adding the logging calls. Good idea. I have seen various stuff in forums on the web saying the cross-compiling may cause issues. I did not read in detail, though. Let's leave in the yahoo groups. Its actually more convenient for me plus possibly someone else may have some thoughts.
