Am Mittwoch, den 26.11.2008, 12:41 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler: > Paul Menzel wrote: > > > Am Montag, den 24.11.2008, 13:32 -0800 schrieb Kok, Auke: > >> Paul Menzel wrote: > >> > Am Montag, den 24.11.2008, 12:52 -0800 schrieb Kok, Auke: > >> >> Does that battery actually work reasonably long or is it dead? > >> > > >> > Well I worked with it, i. e., power cable was *not* plugged in, for > >> > about 2 hours today. So I think it is not dead. > >> > >> ok, can you charge it to full, unplug and redo the proc output? I'd like to > >> see 'remaining capacity' show a meaningful number... > > > > Sorry for the delay. Here you go. > <snip> > > What does the /sys/class/power_device/BAT0/* files have to say? AIUI, more > attention is paid to the /sys interface than the /proc one. If the output > in /sys is sane, maybe it would be better to drop reading from /proc (or use > first /sys, and fallback to /proc).
Looks the same. $ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/charge_full 100000 $ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/charge_full_design 5200000 $ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/charge_now 100000 I hope this is enough. Otherwise I would be greatful for a hint to read out all the values with one command. Thanks, Paul
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
