Am Mittwoch, den 26.11.2008, 16:10 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler: > Paul Menzel wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 26.11.2008, 12:41 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler: > >> Paul Menzel wrote: > >> > >> > Am Montag, den 24.11.2008, 13:32 -0800 schrieb Kok, Auke: > >> >> Paul Menzel wrote: > >> >> > Am Montag, den 24.11.2008, 12:52 -0800 schrieb Kok, Auke: > >> >> >> Does that battery actually work reasonably long or is it dead? > >> >> > > >> >> > Well I worked with it, i. e., power cable was *not* plugged in, for > >> >> > about 2 hours today. So I think it is not dead. > >> >> > >> >> ok, can you charge it to full, unplug and redo the proc output? I'd like > >> >> to see 'remaining capacity' show a meaningful number... > >> > > >> > Sorry for the delay. Here you go. > >> <snip> > >> > >> What does the /sys/class/power_device/BAT0/* files have to say? AIUI, more > >> attention is paid to the /sys interface than the /proc one. If the output > >> in /sys is sane, maybe it would be better to drop reading from /proc (or > >> use > >> first /sys, and fallback to /proc). > > > > Looks the same. > > > > $ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/charge_full > > 100000 > > $ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/charge_full_design > > 5200000 > > $ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/charge_now > > 100000 > > > > I hope this is enough. Otherwise I would be greatful for a hint to read > > out all the values with one command. > > There's probably something wrong in your kernel, then. You might want to > report > a bug. Either that or your battery is broken.
Well, others seem to have the same problem [1]. Thanks, Paul [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2008-October/001477.html
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
