Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 26.11.2008, 12:41 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler: >> Paul Menzel wrote: >> >> > Am Montag, den 24.11.2008, 13:32 -0800 schrieb Kok, Auke: >> >> Paul Menzel wrote: >> >> > Am Montag, den 24.11.2008, 12:52 -0800 schrieb Kok, Auke: >> >> >> Does that battery actually work reasonably long or is it dead? >> >> > >> >> > Well I worked with it, i. e., power cable was *not* plugged in, for >> >> > about 2 hours today. So I think it is not dead. >> >> >> >> ok, can you charge it to full, unplug and redo the proc output? I'd like >> >> to see 'remaining capacity' show a meaningful number... >> > >> > Sorry for the delay. Here you go. >> <snip> >> >> What does the /sys/class/power_device/BAT0/* files have to say? AIUI, more >> attention is paid to the /sys interface than the /proc one. If the output >> in /sys is sane, maybe it would be better to drop reading from /proc (or use >> first /sys, and fallback to /proc). > > Looks the same. > > $ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/charge_full > 100000 > $ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/charge_full_design > 5200000 > $ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/charge_now > 100000 > > I hope this is enough. Otherwise I would be greatful for a hint to read > out all the values with one command.
There's probably something wrong in your kernel, then. You might want to report a bug. Either that or your battery is broken. -- Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
