In response to my suggestion that

>> Could things be set up so that postings over a certain number *might* (at
>> the option of a listnanny, say) be cut off, rather than having it happen
>> automatically?  Thus providing a big stick to wave at malefactors if needed
>> without interfering with normal give and take.

Dan Knight wrote:

> It has to be automatic, because we just don't have list managers
> available 24/7 to do things manually. The exact number will vary based on
> how busy the list is. If there are 100 postings per day, the minimum will
> be much higher than 3. If there are less than 10 postings per day, 3
> might be a very reasonable limit.


It sounds like the limitations proposed will be flexible enough to fit the
eventualities, but the kind of arrangement I had vaguely in mind was not
constant monitoring, but rather a proviso that "postings over x per day [or
whatever formula was decided upon] are subject to rejection," followed by a
discretionary posting-too-much warning sent to an individual who seemed to
be turning into a list-hog, which could then be backed up by turning on
rejection mechanism aimed at that particular person which would
automatically restrict his/her postings in the future.

Best,
Victoria

-- 
Defend democracy:  repeal the Patriot Act


-- 
PowerBooks is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

  Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com   | Enter To Win A |
  -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299   |  Free iBook!   |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

PowerBooks list info:   <http://lowendmac.com/lists/powerbooks.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/powerbooks%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to