> Hello All: > > Actually, even the processors were the same, just labeled differently. > I have this opinion because I decided to overclock and underclock both > my 540 and 520 using a variable frequency oscillator from Mac Upgrade > Specialists. I found that _both_ CPUs had the same lowest frequency (50 > MHz) and the same highest frequency (94 MHz). > > This means, at least to me, that anyone with a 520 can effectively (and > safely) have a 540 as far as speed is concerned, as long as they are > willing to replace the plastic oscillator on the daughter board.
I've got a couple of processors which say on them 33 but have a sticker on them saying 25. Surely cheaper and easier just to get a 540 processor than play around with oscillators ? Best wishes Malcolm Cornelius - The Powerbook Fanatic www.pbfanatic.co.uk MSN Messenger - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ - 47738640 -- PowerBooks is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A | -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299 | Free iBook! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> PowerBooks list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/powerbooks.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/powerbooks%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
