Jeffrey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >It is a 100% useful response. It doesn't solve the problem, so it's clearly not useful.
> If you want HTML mail, PM is not the >client for you. What can be more clear and concise? I absolutely hate it >when non-newbies start whining about HTML. You've obviously used >computers, email, the internet and PM for some time now, figure it out! HTML mails are a fact of life for many people that, unlike myself are unable to choose to filter them out completely - due to company policy or to peer pressure, whether you or I like it or not. The issue is also not HTML mail or not, but how CTM and the affected PM community wants to deal with it, as non spam HTML messages are here and growing. They exist and putting our collective heads into the sand won't get them out of the way. A builtin filter that could turn HTML to pure text without the fuss of the scripting alternatives there are now would potentially get them out of the way for PM users at least. I have no problem with HTML messages myself as I mostly filter those out, but I do think the situation with displaying HTML and not being able to make a normal reply like with pure text is a bit unnecessary. Much better to optionally get rid of the HTML all together while keeping the actual message. Just like we know have spam handling built-in, with some help from Spamsieve and others, I'd like to see the same done for handling HTML messages and turning them optionally into pure text. That would be handling the problem while maintaining the pure text centric idea of PowerMail. > It's a big market No, it's not. If you can't take the "whining", that I refer to as constructive criticism, then take your own advice and unsubscribe. > Obviously, anybody "on the >fence" needs to reassess their wants and needs and either learn to like >PM or learn to like one of the other clients. CTM have not presented any plans not to implement the possibility to copy HTML text nor have they debunked the idea to have the capability to turn HTML to pure text built-in. That is the issue, which you seem to have lost track of in your egocentrism and rage. It's perfectly valid to discuss those issues without having to be attacked for "not understanding the way of PowerMail". You seem to be think you're the only one that understands (or even have the right to) the future of both Email and the application PowerMail. You're clearly do not. You better get used to hearing other people voicing their opinion in spite of your attempts to silence them. PM 5.0 | OS X 10.3.4 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD
