> Jeffrey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > >If that's how you want your email, you probably need to > >use a different program > > This is not a useful response. I absolutely hate it when some > people respond to a problem like that. The user can't be > blaimed for the format of mail that is sent to him/her.
It is a 100% useful response. If you want HTML mail, PM is not the client for you. What can be more clear and concise? I absolutely hate it when non-newbies start whining about HTML. You've obviously used computers, email, the internet and PM for some time now, figure it out! > If HTML encoded inoming mail should be second class citizens > in PM, then PM should have the option to automatically decode > the message to clear text, built-in or come with the > appropriate scripts and software ready to use. That such are > downloadable is not enough. I'll sorta concede to PM needing to get along. Except it already does, as mentioned every month on this board and repeatedly in this thread. Again, if you don't like its implementation of HTML (or windows, or shortcuts, or the toolbar buttons), buy something else. What is the big deal????? If you dislike Coke and like Pepsi, do you drink Coke every day and write Coke saying you should make your beverage taste like Pepsi? It's a big market, use what you want and learn what you use. And, since I know what comes next, don't bother telling me, "I like the other features, just not this one. So why can't I whine about it?" The answer is, people are sick of the whining. Obviously, anybody "on the fence" needs to reassess their wants and needs and either learn to like PM or learn to like one of the other clients. > HTML/XML mail or similar will > sooner or later supersede the pure text messages of today, no > matter what PM users think about it. So what? It's today, not tomorrow. Get the appropriate email client tomorrow when tomorrow arrives. > Personally, however, I prefer pure text. Make up your mind, Mikael. Do you want text or HTML? Jeff T
