Op zondag, 8 juni 2003 schreef Mikael Byström: >Aha Karel, but this you did *not* tell this before. How am I supposed to >know what is not documented by CTM? So there *is* a bug in PM 3.x with >this kind of "stuck" messages and you say nothing? Bravo. >
I'm beginning to dislike the tone of this conversation, but as I'm adressed personally on this matter here is my (last) response: CTMdev has documented the changes of -every- upgrade. Here is the excerpt of the PowerMail 4.0 release notes - July 30th 2002 /quote New features since PowerMail 3.1.2 ....Full rewrite of how messages are managed on the server side , with options to: Delete messages from server after n days Delete messages when deleting locally Purge all retrieved message from the server on next connection Force the download of all messages on the server even if they have already been "seen" .... /unquote So this information was documented by CTM and made public on July 30 2002. Hence my suggestion to you to upgrade. >What about "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"? This doesn't work in an environment where the 'outside world' is constantly changing and, due to one monopolist, cannot confirm to its own standards. >And what if I'd rather spend even more money on another application that >actually behaves the way it's intended to? Feel free to do so. Then join another list.
