-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 08.07.10 14:02, schrieb John Snippe:
> 
> On 8-Jul-10, at 6:43 AM, MB wrote:
> 
>> That could be said, however this is ruling out PowerMail as a client
>> IMHO as the IMAP-support is very basic. But this does depend on the
>> amount of traffic of course. I do check webmail accounts with more
>> sporadic traffic via IMAP in PowerMail
> 
> Yes, that's an option I am looking at.  We have Squirrel on the
> server... but it's REALLY not pwermail, is it?!?

Squirrel is like Roundcube a Webmail frontend for Cyrrus or Dovecot IMAP
Server. This has nothing to do with Powermail.


> 
> I wonder if "environments" will help with the corruption issue... it
> could limit database access to a 'one user - multiple points of access'
> situation, which would stop update collisions and that inherent risk of
> corruption.  Yes/no?

Environments are different databases in Powermail.

That what you try to achieve is best done with IMAP.
If you are having more than 1 mail-account, I'd look into different
mailclients, like Apple Mail or Thunderbird for that.
Powermail was imho not really designed as a IMAP frontend, but as a POP
Mailclient. The clear GUI and the well designed search function of
Powermail is uncompareable to other mail clients, but if you need to
extensivly work with IMAP and/or PGP PM is not the best choice.

cheers
Matthias
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMNdhKAAoJEA4R31O3DV249DwH/32bLOLWByV48T/TcnEmYOjK
SmDU94ZufD5uhK/7uehhsAfUuyL65eLBdy2pF6F2X/oyEfjxqMu1amUDm0p8ejVd
NotqrYJkJ+oIf2G/djEgpd3zbtPCZCgI8Zv6I5VA7mcqdoG5U/HeItDvGc+IGjAj
S4W9ovY8rsuJeOHmjvjXgWHPjjov7t9k4SKlc59QAGIgt+L5Uk2vzKebBHZBokPZ
RIHOx7VaXDHydVtCl4M4LCImw64hlImXyPZ5mKy6ILoday63s5znw50my1mPrOuz
LM3611jrNndQnq5jRpZlFxgjZR/GTHxseqgTn6/3X1gQw/aob6tHpLB4xdT71nM=
=shEZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to