Monticello's diving procedure is classified as Reference Use.

________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Johns, Alex M.
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 6:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Powernet: Diving procedure

Salem Station has an action to "consider" making our diving procedure a 
Category/Level One procedure.  That being in hand signed off as you go, 
(circle/slash) with no step skipping.  The procedure is currently a 
Category/Level Two procedure that requires it to be at the job site for 
reference purposes.  We would like to know what the status of your dive 
procedure(s) is.
Thanks in advance for all your feedback.

Alex Johns
Salem RPS
856-339-3909

________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 1:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Powernet: NUHOMS loading failed fuel

An answer from the Nuclear Fuels Engineering Department at San Onofre Nuclear 
Generating Station follows:


First, is this Surry's first experience with drying a dry shielded canister?  
In other words, did the problem start with the 32-PTH?  Hard to imagine the 
poison used for the canister would influence the rate at which gas is released.

SONGS is still using a 24PT4 canister with Boral poison.  We're close to 
finalizing the design for a 32-cell DSC with metal matrix composite (MMC) 
poison.  We're scheduled to start using the 32PTH2 (MMC) in 2014.

Our vacuum drier discharges to a poly bottle.  A vacuum with HEPA filter sucks 
on the poly bottle.  The vacuum discharges to the voluminous spent fuel 
building; it is not connected directly to the vent stack.

If our vacuum dryer were connected directly to the vent stack, I wouldn't be 
surprised if we observed increases, or spiking, on the effluent monitor.  I 
believe the HEPA filter and huge volume of the spent fuel building dilutes the 
gas to point of being undetectable, or barely detectable.  We've dried some 
gory fuel in the past (all the old failed fuel is in dry storage); Operations 
has never told us to stop because a monitor has alarmed.

Hope this helps.


Jeff Carey
U2/3 Health Physics Supervisor
x87545/87722
Pony mail: J72



From:        Erik P Simon <[email protected]>
To:        "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date:        08/17/2011 04:47 AM
Subject:        Powernet: NUHOMS loading failed fuel
Sent by:        [email protected]
________________________________



Surry Power Station wants to know if anyone has had to deal with loading failed 
fuel into NUHOMS casks specifically the 32-PTH metal matrix type? We have 
recently loaded 4 of 32 assemblies with known leakers and are experiencing 
difficulties in vacuum drying the DSC due to high levels of Kr-85. Our current 
configuration has the vacuum drying system directly discharging to the Vent 
Stack 2 ( Vent Vent), there is no let down or delay prior to the radiation 
monitor.
Thanks,
Erik

Erik Simon
Health Physics Shift Supervisor
Radiation Protection, Surry Power Station

Dominion Generation
Phone:  757-365-2672; Internal: 8-798-2672
Pager:  800-272-5643-3299; E-mail: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may 
be legally confidential and/or privileged and does not in any case represent a 
firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender 
without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The 
information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and 
access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, 
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this 
information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that 
you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.

----------------------------------- Powernet - a service of the Health Physics 
Society Power Reactor Section Powernet archives at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Reply to: [email protected] If 
Questions, contact Mike Russell, CHP at [email protected]

________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s), is 
intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended 
recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering such messages 
to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute 
or retain this message, in whole or in part, without written authorization from 
PSEG. This e-mail may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged 
information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
sender immediately. This notice is included in all e-mail messages leaving 
PSEG. Thank you for your cooperation.

Reply via email to