bereng commented on code in PR #2110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/2110#discussion_r1101121844
##########
src/java/org/apache/cassandra/schema/SchemaKeyspace.java:
##########
@@ -688,15 +695,58 @@ private static void
addColumnToSchemaMutation(TableMetadata table, ColumnMetadat
{
AbstractType<?> type = column.type;
if (type instanceof ReversedType)
- type = ((ReversedType) type).baseType;
+ type = ((ReversedType<?>) type).baseType;
- builder.update(Columns)
+ Row.SimpleBuilder rowBuilder = builder.update(Columns)
.row(table.name, column.name.toString())
.add("column_name_bytes", column.name.bytes)
.add("kind", column.kind.toString().toLowerCase())
.add("position", column.position())
.add("clustering_order",
column.clusteringOrder().toString().toLowerCase())
.add("type", type.asCQL3Type().toString());
+
+ // Dynamic data masking functions shouldn't be attached to columns
during rolling upgrades
+ // to avoid sending mutations with columns that are unknown to the old
nodes.
+ ColumnMask mask = column.getMask();
+ if (ColumnMask.clusterSupportsMaskedColumns())
Review Comment:
As I am reading the PR I wonder if `clusterSupportsMaskedColumns()` should
be moved to `QueryProcessor` or some other 'higher'/clusterish class as being
buried in `ColumnMask` sounds weird to me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
