bdeggleston commented on code in PR #2144:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/2144#discussion_r1127166656
##########
src/java/org/apache/cassandra/service/accord/AccordStateCache.java:
##########
@@ -149,17 +145,12 @@ public NamedMap(String name)
}
}
- public final Map<Object, Node<?, ?>> active = new HashMap<>();
private final Map<Object, Node<?, ?>> cache = new HashMap<>();
- private final Map<Object, WriteOnlyGroup<?, ?>> pendingWriteOnly = new
HashMap<>();
- private final Set<Instance<?, ?>> instances = new HashSet<>();
-
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<?>> loadFutures = new
NamedMap<>("loadFutures");
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<?>> saveFutures = new
NamedMap<>("saveFutures");
+ private final Set<Instance<?, ?, ?>> instances = new HashSet<>();
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<Data>> readFutures = new
NamedMap<>("readFutures");
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<?>> writeFutures = new
NamedMap<>("writeFutures");
+ private final NamedMap<Object, AsyncResult<Void>> saveResults = new
NamedMap<>("saveResults");
+ private int linked = 0;
Review Comment:
> Wouldn't that lead to fairly inefficient use of the available memory?
You mean calling maybeEvict every minute?
> If we're looking this up lazily, how are we clearing the saveResults map?
In the common case, it happens once the safe future completes
> Are we accounting for the memory we're consuming in this map?
No
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
