bdeggleston commented on code in PR #2144:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/2144#discussion_r1127206899
##########
src/java/org/apache/cassandra/service/accord/AccordStateCache.java:
##########
@@ -149,17 +145,12 @@ public NamedMap(String name)
}
}
- public final Map<Object, Node<?, ?>> active = new HashMap<>();
private final Map<Object, Node<?, ?>> cache = new HashMap<>();
- private final Map<Object, WriteOnlyGroup<?, ?>> pendingWriteOnly = new
HashMap<>();
- private final Set<Instance<?, ?>> instances = new HashSet<>();
-
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<?>> loadFutures = new
NamedMap<>("loadFutures");
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<?>> saveFutures = new
NamedMap<>("saveFutures");
+ private final Set<Instance<?, ?, ?>> instances = new HashSet<>();
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<Data>> readFutures = new
NamedMap<>("readFutures");
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<?>> writeFutures = new
NamedMap<>("writeFutures");
+ private final NamedMap<Object, AsyncResult<Void>> saveResults = new
NamedMap<>("saveResults");
+ private int linked = 0;
Review Comment:
> But as far as maintaining the broader eviction strategy is concerned,
wouldn't this provide the perfect hook to update an additional pointer that
permits us to maintain the map efficiently?
Could you elaborate on this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
