bdeggleston commented on code in PR #2144:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/2144#discussion_r1128731964
##########
src/java/org/apache/cassandra/service/accord/AccordStateCache.java:
##########
@@ -149,17 +147,12 @@ public NamedMap(String name)
}
}
- public final Map<Object, Node<?, ?>> active = new HashMap<>();
private final Map<Object, Node<?, ?>> cache = new HashMap<>();
- private final Map<Object, WriteOnlyGroup<?, ?>> pendingWriteOnly = new
HashMap<>();
- private final Set<Instance<?, ?>> instances = new HashSet<>();
+ private final Set<Instance<?, ?, ?>> instances = new HashSet<>();
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<?>> loadFutures = new
NamedMap<>("loadFutures");
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<?>> saveFutures = new
NamedMap<>("saveFutures");
-
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<Data>> readFutures = new
NamedMap<>("readFutures");
- private final NamedMap<Object, Future<?>> writeFutures = new
NamedMap<>("writeFutures");
+ private final NamedMap<Object, AsyncResult<Void>> saveResults = new
NamedMap<>("saveResults");
+ private int unreferenced = 0;
Node<?, ?> head;
Review Comment:
Node also has a bunch of stuff we don’t want on the cache, and I don’t like
the idea of AccordLoadingState extending a Node type. It could be done with
interfaces, albeit more awkwardly, but I don’t really see the benefit, aside
from slightly simpler push/pop methods?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
