Hi Peter-san, Thank you for your quick reply. Comments are in line.
On 2014/01/24, at 22:57, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > Signed PGP part > On 01/24/2014 06:02 AM, Takahiro Nemoto wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > Yoneya-san and I submitted new version of precis mappings document. > > > Thank you for updating the document! > > > We changed the definition of local case mapping and > > That is better, thanks. If I understand your text correctly, we might > want to say very clearly that a PRECIS profile needs to either use > case mapping or use local case mapping, but that it can't use both > (i.e., local case mapping is an alternative to case mapping, not > something additional on top of case mapping, since the local case > mapping rule will apply normal case mapping if there is no > locale-specific mapping). That's exactly right. I agree with what you said, thanks. > > > added a new open issue to reflect comments in IETF88. > > I think it is fine to leave handling of final sigma up to Unicode, and > to not define a new table. If we decide to take that course, you might > include one or two examples (I provided some in a previous posting to > this list). Thank you. Considering the maintenance and preservation of the document, I think it would be better to leave the handling of final sigma up to Unicode. I will modify the mappings document to include an example. Regards, Nemo > > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > precis mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
