Hi Peter-san Thank you very much for your comment. If there are not any comments, we would like to revise the mappings document according to the current consensus.
Regards, Nemo On 2014/02/08, at 9:24, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/5/14, 5:39 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 2/5/14, 3:41 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >>> On 05/02/2014 00:03, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>>> On 2/4/14, 3:01 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>> >>>>> On 24/01/2014 13:57, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>>>>> On 01/24/2014 06:02 AM, Takahiro Nemoto wrote: >>>>> [...] >>>>>>> We changed the definition of local case mapping and >>>>>> That is better, thanks. If I understand your text correctly, we might >>>>>> want to say very clearly that a PRECIS profile needs to either use >>>>>> case mapping or use local case mapping, but that it can't use both >>>>>> (i.e., local case mapping is an alternative to case mapping, not >>>>>> something additional on top of case mapping, since the local case >>>>>> mapping rule will apply normal case mapping if there is no >>>>>> locale-specific mapping). >>>>> If that is the way we want to go, then this contradicts section 5 of >>>>> draft-ietf-precis-framework: >>>>> >>>>> 2. Optionally, additional mappings such as those as specified in >>>>> [I-D.ietf-precis-mappings]: >>>>> 1. Delimiter mapping >>>>> 2. Special mapping >>>>> 3. Local case mapping >>>>> 3. Non-local case mapping >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I.e. draft-ietf-precis-framework needs to be updated to make this clear >>>>> as well. >>>> >>>> Agreed. I think that the definition of "local case mapping" has >>>> changed in the latest version of the mappings document, such that (if >>>> we think the new direction is appropriate) we'd need to do this: >>>> >>>> OLD >>>> 2. Optionally, additional mappings such as those as specified in >>>> [I-D.ietf-precis-mappings]: >>>> 1. Delimiter mapping >>>> 2. Special mapping >>>> 3. Local case mapping >>>> 3. Non-local case mapping >>>> >>>> NEW >>>> 2. Optionally, additional mappings such as those as specified in >>>> [I-D.ietf-precis-mappings]: >>>> 1. Delimiter mapping >>>> 2. Special mapping >>>> 3. Either "local case mapping" from [I-D.ietf-precis-mappings] or >>>> case mapping as described under Section 4.1.3 of this document >>>> >>>> Does that look right? >>> Yes, this looks good. >> >> Thanks for the feedback. >> >>> I think [I-D.ietf-precis-mappings] is definitely >>> normative now with your new text (it wasn't before). >> >> You are right. > > Seeing no objections, I'll submit a new version with that revised text. > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > _______________________________________________ > precis mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
