On 2/5/14, 7:17 AM, Takahiro Nemoto wrote:
Dear all,
Peter-san, Alexey-san, thank you for your quick response.
If you have any comments for open issues in mappings-06, I would like to
hear about it.
These comments will be reflected on the updated mappings document as -07
before cut off date(2/14),
as it will influence the framework document.
There are two points that have not reached a consensus in the mappings
document .
(1) Define local case mapping as an alternative to case mapping in the
PRECIS framework
pros: German eszett, Turkish dotless i, etc. will not be mapped
contrary to the users' expectation.
cons: It is necessary to modify the framework document.
options:
(A) Support the change of -06
(B) Don't support the change of -06, and restore the algorithm of -05
I think -06 is fine, so I support (A).
(2) Way to deal with the context dependent mapping for both Greek sigma
and final sigma.
(a) Define extra mapping table for sigma and final sigma inside
mappings document
pros: Sigma and final sigma will not be mapped contrary to users'
expectation.
cons: It will be necessary to update this document to follow unicode's
updated version.
(b) Leave it to unicode's definition
pros: It is not necessary to define extra mapping table for sigma and
final sigma.
cons: Unless unicode is updated and a new definition to map both sigma
and final sigma**has been added,
final sigma will be mapped to sigma.
options:
(A) Support the above (a)
(B) Support the above (b)
I would appreciate your comment.
I support (B).
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
