I agree we want one set over time. But I thought that we had agreed in Toronto that we were going to try to get Precis right, then look at removing the tables from IDNA201x, including Precis by reference in those documents.
On 8/28/14, 3:08 PM, "John C Klensin" <[email protected]> wrote: >FWIW, I think that each example like this strengthens my case >for incorporating IDNA tables by reference, rather than copy, as >much as possible. It is hard enough to get these things right >in a single case, getting them right for more than one (and >having them consistent) is much harder. Moreover, as we have >discovered with IDNA (both Stringprep and IDNA2008's approach), >getting the level of attention to detail needed to check and >correct an initial set of tables is much easier than keeping >that level of attention when new Unicode versions show up and >need to be checked and considered. > >best, > john > > >--On Thursday, August 28, 2014 23:59 +0900 Takahiro Nemoto ><[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, Peter-san >> >> I've checked the code point table in framework document. >> And I found several mistakes in writing and corrected these >> mistakes as following. >> >># 1 >> 0A35.OA36 ; PVALID # GURMUKHI LET VA..GURMUKHI LET >> SHA -> 0A35..0A36 ; PVALID # GURMUKHI LET >> VA..GURMUKHI LET SHA >> >> >># 2 >> 0EE0..0EEF ; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved> >> -> 0EE0..0EFF ; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved> >> 0F00 ; PVALID # TIB SYLL OM >> >># 3, 4 >> 110D0..110F8; PVALID # SORA SOMPENG LETTER SAH..SORA >> SOMPE -> 110D0..110E8; PVALID # SORA SOMPENG LETTER >> SAH..SORA SOMPE 110F9..110EF; UNASSIGNED # >> <reserved>..<reserved> -> 110F9..110FF; UNASSIGNED # >> <reserved>..<reserved> 110F0..110F9; PVALID # SORA >> SOMPENG DIG ZERO..SORA SOMPENG DI >> >># 5 >> 116CA..1FFFF; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved> >> -> 116CA..11FFF; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved> >> 12000..1236E; PVALID # CUNEI SIGN A..CUNEI SIGN ZUM >> >># 6 >> 「1F645..1F64F」 >> 1F645..1F650; FREE_PVAL # FACE W NO GOOD GESTURE..PERSON >> W FO -> 1F645..1F64F; FREE_PVAL # FACE W NO GOOD >> GESTURE..PERSON W FO 1F650..1F67F; UNASSIGNED # >> <reserved>..<reserved> >> >># 7, 8 >> 2A700..2B734; PVALID # <CJK Ideograph Extension C> >> 2A735..2A739; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved> >> -> 2B735..2B739; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved> >> 2A740..2B81D; PVALID # <CJK Ideograph Extension D> >> -> 2B740..2B81D; PVALID # <CJK Ideograph Extension D> >> 2B81E..2F7FF; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved> >> >> And I've compared the revised table with my table, which had >> been generated from my code. Kindly please see attached diff >> files for reference. Please let me know if you have any >> questions or comments. >> >> >> Regards, >> nemo > > > > >_______________________________________________ >precis mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis > -- Joe Hildebrand _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
