On 9/2/14, 1:00 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 8/30/14, 12:41 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote: >> >> On 29 aug 2014, at 23:03, John C Klensin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> My interpretation is that sections 7.1-7.10 of the >>>> precis-framework document will be changed to reference >>>> sections 2.1-2.10 of RFC 5982, not copy text from RFC 5892. >>>> >>>> This gives us one set of rules ("A" through "J" from RFC 5892, >>>> "K" through "R" for PRECIS). >>> >>> That definitely works for me. >> >> Sounds good, I think. Let me just check...do you imply that the >>referenced rule B from 5892 is in PRECIS still called B? Not that L in >>PRECIS is B in 5892? >> >> I think we should call the same rule the same letter in both standards, >>if you know what I mean. I think that is what you say, right? > >That has been the intent all along, but again if people think we haven't >actualized that intent then let us know! I'm fine with this approach as well. I was going to suggest moving the start of the PRECIS block to "P", but I don't think it's worth the hassle. -- Joe Hildebrand _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
