On 9/2/14, 10:27 AM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
On 9/2/14, 1:00 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 8/30/14, 12:41 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
On 29 aug 2014, at 23:03, John C Klensin <[email protected]> wrote:
My interpretation is that sections 7.1-7.10 of the
precis-framework document will be changed to reference
sections 2.1-2.10 of RFC 5982, not copy text from RFC 5892.
This gives us one set of rules ("A" through "J" from RFC 5892,
"K" through "R" for PRECIS).
That definitely works for me.
Sounds good, I think. Let me just check...do you imply that the
referenced rule B from 5892 is in PRECIS still called B? Not that L in
PRECIS is B in 5892?
I think we should call the same rule the same letter in both standards,
if you know what I mean. I think that is what you say, right?
That has been the intent all along, but again if people think we haven't
actualized that intent then let us know!
I'm fine with this approach as well. I was going to suggest moving the
start of the PRECIS block to "P", but I don't think it's worth the hassle.
Yeah but do we have a i26 problem when we run out of letters from the
Latin alphabet? ;-)
Peter
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
