Yes, we will most definitely include the IDNA tables only by reference
in version -18 of the PRECIS framework.
On 8/29/14, 11:01 AM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
I agree we want one set over time. But I thought that we had agreed in
Toronto that we were going to try to get Precis right, then look at
removing the tables from IDNA201x, including Precis by reference in those
documents.
On 8/28/14, 3:08 PM, "John C Klensin" <[email protected]> wrote:
FWIW, I think that each example like this strengthens my case
for incorporating IDNA tables by reference, rather than copy, as
much as possible. It is hard enough to get these things right
in a single case, getting them right for more than one (and
having them consistent) is much harder. Moreover, as we have
discovered with IDNA (both Stringprep and IDNA2008's approach),
getting the level of attention to detail needed to check and
correct an initial set of tables is much easier than keeping
that level of attention when new Unicode versions show up and
need to be checked and considered.
best,
john
--On Thursday, August 28, 2014 23:59 +0900 Takahiro Nemoto
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi, Peter-san
I've checked the code point table in framework document.
And I found several mistakes in writing and corrected these
mistakes as following.
# 1
0A35.OA36 ; PVALID # GURMUKHI LET VA..GURMUKHI LET
SHA -> 0A35..0A36 ; PVALID # GURMUKHI LET
VA..GURMUKHI LET SHA
# 2
0EE0..0EEF ; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved>
-> 0EE0..0EFF ; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved>
0F00 ; PVALID # TIB SYLL OM
# 3, 4
110D0..110F8; PVALID # SORA SOMPENG LETTER SAH..SORA
SOMPE -> 110D0..110E8; PVALID # SORA SOMPENG LETTER
SAH..SORA SOMPE 110F9..110EF; UNASSIGNED #
<reserved>..<reserved> -> 110F9..110FF; UNASSIGNED #
<reserved>..<reserved> 110F0..110F9; PVALID # SORA
SOMPENG DIG ZERO..SORA SOMPENG DI
# 5
116CA..1FFFF; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved>
-> 116CA..11FFF; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved>
12000..1236E; PVALID # CUNEI SIGN A..CUNEI SIGN ZUM
# 6
「1F645..1F64F」
1F645..1F650; FREE_PVAL # FACE W NO GOOD GESTURE..PERSON
W FO -> 1F645..1F64F; FREE_PVAL # FACE W NO GOOD
GESTURE..PERSON W FO 1F650..1F67F; UNASSIGNED #
<reserved>..<reserved>
# 7, 8
2A700..2B734; PVALID # <CJK Ideograph Extension C>
2A735..2A739; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved>
-> 2B735..2B739; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved>
2A740..2B81D; PVALID # <CJK Ideograph Extension D>
-> 2B740..2B81D; PVALID # <CJK Ideograph Extension D>
2B81E..2F7FF; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved>
And I've compared the revised table with my table, which had
been generated from my code. Kindly please see attached diff
files for reference. Please let me know if you have any
questions or comments.
Regards,
nemo
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
