On 28 Mar 2016, at 13:30, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 3/1/16 3:56 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 3/1/16 3:23 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
hello,
we were thinking of closing the working group since the main
topics
have been done and published as RFC. However, as some mailing list
discussions require that some corrections to RFC 7564 and 7613 are
needed, we added those two milestones to the charter. The intent is
when
those are done, we would close the working group.
Thanks, Marc. Here is my understanding of what needs to be done:
In RFC 7564:
1. Change §5.2.3 to mention Unicode toLower() as an alternative to
Unicode Default Case Folding and describe the circumstances in which
toLower() is appropriate.
2. Change the order of operations in §7 from MUST to SHOULD (we've
already deviated from that slightly in RFC 7613 §3.2.1).
3. Clarify the meaning of 'preparation' (because it is different from
what stringprep meant by the term).
In RFC 7613:
a. Revisit Unicode Default Case Folding here, too.
b. Modify the *presentation* (but not the content) of the rules for
each
profile, along the lines of what we did in RFC 7700 (i.e., describe
the
rules in one section and then use them in separate sections on
preparation, enforcement, and comparison).
We'll also want to review and correct the errata that have been
reported.
I can commit to doing this work.
FYI, I plan to submit -00 versions of the bis documents when the
submission window opens again on April 3.
Marc, would you like me to submit these as individual I-Ds or WG I-Ds?
(They would be draft-[ietf|saintandre]-rfc[7564|7613|7700]-bis-00.)
I’m sure that the wg is likely to be ok with wg drafts, but let’s do
the normal process. Please submit first as individual draft and we will
call later for wg adoption.
Marc.
Peter
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
