On 3/28/16 2:01 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
On 28 Mar 2016, at 15:50, John C Klensin wrote:--On Monday, March 28, 2016 15:28 -0400 Marc Blanchet [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Marc, would you like me to submit these as individual I-Ds or WG I-Ds? (They would be draft-[ietf|saintandre]-rfc[7564|7613|7700]-bis-00.) I'm sure that the wg is likely to be ok with wg drafts, but let's do the normal process. Please submit first as individual draft and we will call later for wg adoption. Marc, For whatever my opinion as a participant is worth, that would be meaningless, time-wasting, ritual for its own sake. disagree. the step from individual to wg is the normal process and has no impact on technical work: the technical work can continue whatever the filename is. Let’s spend time on technical discussions on the content of the to-be-published draft.
I have no preference, but to be clear the -00 versions will be exactly what is in the published RFCs so that we can more easily track changes.
Peter _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
