On 3 Apr 2016, at 13:00, Barry Leiba wrote:
I'm sure that the wg is likely to be ok with wg drafts, but
let's do the normal process. Please submit first as
individual draft and we will call later for wg adoption.
For whatever my opinion as a participant is worth, that would be
meaningless, time-wasting, ritual for its own sake.
disagree. the step from individual to wg is the normal process and
has
no impact on technical work: the technical work can continue
whatever
the filename is. Let’s spend time on technical discussions on the
content of the to-be-published draft.
I have no preference, but to be clear the -00 versions will be
exactly what
is in the published RFCs so that we can more easily track changes.
As AD for now, still, I'll say that I do have a preference, and a
rather strong one: these are updates to documents the working group
has already published. The working group has already decided to
update them. Please just submit them as working group documents from
the start.
Ok. So Peter just publish it and I’ll approve it.
Marc.
Even going through motions here makes a statement that the
working group is not working on what it agreed to work on.
Barry
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
