On 4/3/16 10:00 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
I'm sure that the wg is likely to be ok with wg drafts, but
let's do the normal process. Please submit first as
individual draft and we will call later for wg adoption.
For whatever my opinion as a participant is worth, that would be
meaningless, time-wasting, ritual for its own sake.
disagree. the step from individual to wg is the normal process and has
no impact on technical work: the technical work can continue whatever
the filename is. Let’s spend time on technical discussions on the
content of the to-be-published draft.
I have no preference, but to be clear the -00 versions will be exactly what
is in the published RFCs so that we can more easily track changes.
As AD for now, still, I'll say that I do have a preference, and a
rather strong one: these are updates to documents the working group
has already published. The working group has already decided to
update them. Please just submit them as working group documents from
the start. Even going through motions here makes a statement that the
working group is not working on what it agreed to work on.
-00 versions submitted.
These are as close as I could make the documents to the published RFCs.
By the end of the week I will publish -01 versions incorporating the
fixes previously outlined.
Peter
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
