> From: "Michael O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The GBP can't really be the issue - ok so the Kodak costs twice as much as > the Fuji but that just means it'll take 2 months of digital charges to pay > off instead of 1. The 14n, as you'll know, is set for release in December > so that effectively means they'll be widely available in the Spring. Not according to the rep at the digital day I went to yesterday. Think in terms of June/July just to catch up on present orders! To me the Kodak looks like a worthy reason to spend the extra over the spec for the Fuji. But is the leap in cost worth considering the Cannon D1s over the Kodak I muse. The only reason I can see for buying the Cannon is if you have a bag full of expensive Cannon Lenses. Or have I missed something when comparing the two? > > Michael O'Brien >> >> So I'm almost completely decided to buy the Fuji S2. But just before I >> do, if anyone here present knows of any reason why I should not (eg >> �2000 10 mega pixel camera, or Coolpix style camera without integral >> lens, coming out in January), could they please say so now, or forever >> hold their peace. =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
