Dear Richard The way it should work is like this. Say someone has a problem with blocked inkjet nozzles. They go to the archive and find a ton of stuff and don't bother to post to the list at all. That prevents a thread of about forty posts appearing in all our in boxes over the next week. Do the same for some of the other high traffic threads and the amount of actual traffic, including spam, will be much lower. In a year's time just think how much material will be in the archive. No need to ask questions and wait for answers about firewalls, Flextight scanners, photoshop actions etc......
Yours Bob Croxford In a message dated 12/8/02 2:25:49 PM, someone writes: > >This directive of not including email addresses in postings is obviously > >tripping up a lot of good people and frankly one does have to ask the >question....Does having an Archive really warrant this level of >aggravation? The list owner made the directive for very valid reasons >which I am sure most of us support, but is the price worth paying? Who > >is using the archive, is it really of value to listees? > =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
