From: Duncan McNeill > These shortcuts - and I guess that I am not the only one to find them > of great use- didn't just 'happen', they were carefully coded- and to > glibly state that they are undocumented certainly fails to convince me. > Could it be that there are certain combinations vouchsafed to alpha, > beta, or even omega testers that will make power presentations 'worth > the money' for attendees?
Duncan. . . You are wrong. There is absolutely no truth to this theory. The Photoshop engineers and the alpha testers work very hard to get everything possible into the program-sometimes that happens up to the last possible moment. Such was the case with the imaging numbering feature. The problem is that the Q&E teams, responsible for documenting features and writing the manual are trying to write about a moving target. As features change, they have to go back and re-write the documentation. As you might expect, this goes on up till the last moment, BUT, the manual has to be printed. . .which means a led time of about 4 weeks or so. So, anything changed or added after the manual and documentation gets shipped to the printer just doesn't get written up. Some stuff gets added literally at the last moment. Last year at this time, Martin Evening and I were in California shooting our Photoshop Masters DVD. At the filming was Marc Pawliger (getting away for a weekend at a nice B&B). Marc was kind enough to to do a tech review of our programming. During that session, Martin & I complained about the lack of functionality for starting a numbering at a specific number. He took that back and a solution was written into Photoshop that came AFTER the cut off date for the manual. So, should they NOT have written in the functionality? They did it at our request, but it didn't get documented. I would rather have it in even if it doesn't get documented. Photoshop 3 had an incredible number of undocumented features. . .and I mean a LOT! Various engineers would literally write in functionality and not tell anybody. That caused a lot of problems. Starting with v4, every effort is made to document -as best as possible, everything in Photoshop. Some things slip through the cracks. Could they do a better job? Yep, and they really do try. But we're all human ya know. On the other hand, users are not particularly well known for actually READING the friggin' manual or the READ ME when installing or checking the web site for updates or new info. This is the reality of the situation. . . Regards, Jeff Schewe =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
