It was 16/7/03 2:12 pm, when Bob Croxford wrote:

> Every time this subject crops up someone puts forward the idea that the
> picture library is wrong.

> Your idea for a test is farcical. Why scan a 35mm tranny? Why not 6x7
> or 4x5? What we are talking about is quality.

Bob

With all due respect, I don't think you read my post! I did say the agencies
can set the bar where ever they think fit - it's their business. By all
means ridicule members who are trying to be helpful but do read their posts
first.

Following your argument, one would think that agencies ONLY accept 4x5, 6x7
and drum scans from trannies. According to Amanda, the agency she was
referring to accepts uninterpolated files of 28mb files but not 17mb files
straight out of a D60, S2 or a D100. So why go to 6x7 and produce a 300mb
(or whatEver) file to compare with? Even a lowly 35mm scanner is perfectly
capable of producing a 28+mb file and the S2, as I said, can produce 35.5mb
files straight out of the camera!

> Are you going to suggest that 35mm is no different to larger film?

Do you honestly think I'm that dumb?...Your remark seems to say that's what
you think. 

I think you're taking my post, which I thought was trying to help Amanda,
out of context and twisting it for whatever motives you have. I must say, it
doesn't sound like the helpful Bob Croxford I am used to...having a rough
day, maybe?

If the ONLY criteria for selling images was quality, I would give my 5 year
old a 6x7 and let her shoot stock. I think people like HCB and Elliott
Erwitt have proved that "most" people don't give a toss for quality as you
are defining it: pixels and more of them. It's HOW those pixels are arranged
that makes, breaks and sells a picture.

However, if an agency says they want pixels and more of them, there's not a
lot you can do but supply pixels and more of them. Amanda, on the other
hand, wanted to persuade the agency to accept fewer pixels and your post
isn't in the least helpful in that respect.

I don't think I will waste time answering the rest...


Respectfully,


Shangara.


===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to