IT WAS NOT A BAD CAMERA. It was only bad if: 1) you did not know how to drive it properly ( hence our training days) (Its like going from a mini to a Ferrari!) 2) if you wanted good quality in poor light above ISO200 3) if you had a lens with poor chromatic abberation
If you used it as very many do within its range it is good - very good. No camera can be good absolutely all round.If so we would still all be using Box Brownies! This chechnology is moving fast - even Canon changed their range the same age as the 14n but there you have to buy a new camera and not just get a new chip and analogue board upgrade. Many 14n owners do not want an upgrade as it means moving up from a loqw of 80 ISO to 160 base. Do you have one or have you listened to others? =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
