The photographers I know who used the 14n were all shooting Raw. Two switched to Canon (1DS's), 1 is very happy with the 14n and the other has returned to film swearing never to shoot digital again - this is not the fault of Kodak but he hated the thought of sitting in front of a computer screen :-)
Personally I've been a user of Kodak's digital products for several years. I'm still blown away by the quality the DCS520 achieved from a now modest 2mp. I'm also eagerly awaiting to see the DCS ProSlr/c.
Kevin
On 19 Apr 2004, at 08:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
reply to Kevin, "3 out of 4 returned them"
Surely you are talking about the 14n and not the Pro SLRn?
I must repeat for the record. 14ns were much maligned but those that were
trained in its use were happy.
I believe when it was launched many were still of the mindset that a
camera was only good if it worked with jpegs straight out of the box.
These days most are now genned up a bit on the value of raw files, which
is what the Kodak cameras are designed to work with.
=============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
