Bob...

Yours is not an objective response to my points. You do not directly
answer my criticisms ie:

1) None of the reviews I have seen involve photography in any but
controllable lighting situations.

2) It's hard to predict when aliasing  effects will occur unless one makes
work in controlled or dull lighting.

3) Inspection of results must be very thorough as a result, in case such
an effect is subtly present in an otherwise excellent image. (ie: under
time pressure this may be missed and will then appear in print 15 feet
high!).

4) Workflow time must be increased in post-processing to repair such problems


> Your comments about
> your experiences are not uncommon among new users of these cameras.
 --

 --
Paul R. W. Freeman
w:www.architecturalimages.co.uk


-- 
____________________________________________________
Message scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
<http://www.newnet.co.uk/av/> and believed to be clean

===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to