Steve

> What was once a vibrant, elitist group of imaging professionals has become a
> humdrum talking shop where perhaps 50 people talk and 1500 listen. Those
> 1500 contribute nothing to the list so why are they on it?

Not sure what upsets you here, is there a problem in 1500 "others" reading
posts and probably learning from them ? Maybe they are too scared to ask for
or offer advice...can't think why.

> I'm not trying to stop you learning or teaching. What I am saying is that
> most list members only take & never give. For most of us its a one way
> transaction with little return. Just why should I teach people who never
> ever give anything in return - I refer to the silent 1500 (or more)

When I ask a really dumb question I'm sure lots of folk go "not again", but
some kind soul takes the time to answer, (its usually Michael Wilkinson and
for the last time, no I don't take Luncheon Vouchers anymore). I personally
always say thanks on list and write to the indivdual off list to say thanks
for your time. Not sure how else I can show my gratitude ?


> imaging and how they can change their ideas to better fit the market. No
> offer of even a free lunch in return for commercially valuable information

So its lunch you are after ?  8-)
 
> I would advocate a registration system that would at the very least hold a
> bio of each member in order that you knew who you were talking to (if you
> wanted to look them up) plus a declaration from each member that their
> income derived from professional imaging. Whether or not that would improve
> the list topics is unknown but it would create a group conversing as equals.

I have too agree with you here, it would be very helpful to be able to know
one another a little better. Cutting out those that do not reach "our" high
standards might make this list a little too precious for some though.

callan

===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to