Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:01:54 -0800, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suspect that plone.relations would be a good way to achieve both of
these things.
+1 to what Martin said, and I'd like to add that I'd love to (long-term)
see if we can get the members-as-content paradigm into Plone itself. It's
pretty disappointing that it isn't already working like that.
(Not speaking on behalf of the framework team, etc etc ;)
One thing I posted to Ross on the remember list was that a better use of
time instead of maintaining remember was reworking the api for user
registration and user handling in Plone so that remember essentially
goes away. ie create a new CA based user system for plone.
has the nice side effect one eliminating more skin based code from plone.
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
