Previously Alexander Limi wrote: > On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:01:54 -0800, Martin Aspeli > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I suspect that plone.relations would be a good way to achieve both of > >these things. > > +1 to what Martin said, and I'd like to add that I'd love to (long-term) > see if we can get the members-as-content paradigm into Plone itself. It's > pretty disappointing that it isn't already working like that.
For what it's worthI am as yet unconvinced that that would improve things for a standard Plone site. The added complexity and numbers of bugs and performance problems we have seen and the fact that it is harder to have a decent integration with non-local user sources (LDAP/SQL/RADIUS/etc.) make me think that the current situation is just fine. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
