On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 19:44 -0500, Alex Clark wrote: > On 2/23/11 8:24 AM, Johannes Raggam wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 10:50 -0800, cewing wrote: > >> Maurits van Rees-3 wrote: > >>> This says that with the standard installer you still get a > >>> buildout-based setup. > >>> For non-developers that probably is a better start; they will get a > >>> standard buildout setup and can tweak the buildout.cfg for minor changes. > >> precisely. Thanks, Maurits. That's exactly what we are trying to say. > >> Can > >> it be clearer? Nicer? Sure. Any suggestions as to how?? Let me know. > > thanks for clarification! maybe we can add something like "if you are > > not a developer, than...". well, next time, i'm working on the > > tutorial-article where i want to use ZopeSkel, i'll think of something. > As someone who has hated this message since day 1, I'll take a stab. How > about just a few minor changes and snips like this: > > > ************************************************************************** > ** *** NOTE: This template is for developers. > > ** If you just want to install Plone, the preferred way to get a > ** buildout-based setup for Plone is to use the standard installer for > ** your operating system (the Windows installer, the Mac installer, or > ** the Unified > ** Installer for Linux/Unix/BSD). These give you a best-practice, > ** widely-used setup with an isolated Python and a well-documented > ** buildout. > **************************************************************************
thanks! IMO, thats clearer and better! ,,,johannes raggam > > > Alex > > > > > > > ,,,johannes raggam > > > >> > >> c > > > > -- johannes raggam / thet python plone zope development http://johannes.raggam.co.at/ mailto:[email protected] http://bluedynamics.com/ _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
