Alan Bourke <> wrote: >> Now why would you think that the web would take off and the older >> desktop interface had met it's apex? > > Because that's an example of an application that suits a > browser-based implementation? There are very many that don't.
You are missing the enthusiasm of the industry where most of IT was swept up in the .COM rush. The better part of the industry over spent their seed money but there are still 20% of them kicking today. I find it hard to determine where an app is not a fit in one arena and a sure fit in the other. Any pointer or a guideline for what works and doesn't? Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.13/463 - Release Date: 10/4/2006 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
