I did read it but misread "The right response to that would have been to go in immediately" as involving an invasion.
Questions and thoughts though: 1. What was the drone doing over Iran when it was supposed to be over Afghanistan? 2. The US thought it had been smashed to pieces, how did they get that so wrong? 3. If they couldn't communicate with it how would they know where it was to attack it? 4. Iran claim to have shot it down... if they did surely it would be in pieces not as a whole 5. Iran is a sovereign country.. bombing it for no valid reason other than the military's incompetence would be perceived as an act of war in many countries and give legitimacy to Iran -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: 15 December 2011 12:04 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Cheney: "Obama should have destroyed drone" Adam Buckland wrote: > Yes invade Iran... that'd be a good idea... especially as no one knew > where this drone was... and what was it doing over Iran in any event.. > if it hadn't crashed of its own accord they were well within their > rights to bring it down > > What a pile of rubbish dressed up to be some attempt at valid > criticism... Hi Adam, Once again, you commented without actually reading the article. You need to stop doing that. The article said "you can do that from the air" and you can. Israel is about to blow them to kingdom come anyway. > http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=48147 -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
